Burp Suite, the leading toolkit for web application security testing

PortSwigger Web Security Blog

Tuesday, July 26, 2016

Introducing Burp Infiltrator

The latest release of Burp Suite introduces a new tool, called Burp Infiltrator.

Burp Infiltrator is a tool for instrumenting target web applications in order to facilitate testing using Burp Scanner. Burp Infiltrator modifies the target application so that Burp can detect cases where its input is passed to potentially unsafe APIs on the server side. In industry jargon, this capability is known as IAST (interactive application security testing).

Burp Infiltrator currently supports applications written in Java or other JVM-based languages such as Groovy. Java versions from 4 and upwards are supported. In future, Burp Infiltrator will support other platforms such as .NET.

How Burp Infiltrator works

  1. The Burp user exports the Burp Infiltrator installer from Burp, via the "Burp" menu.
  2. The application developer or administrator installs Burp Infiltrator by running it on the machine containing the application bytecode.
  3. Burp Infiltrator patches the application bytecode to inject instrumentation hooks at locations where potentially unsafe APIs are called.
  4. The application is launched in the normal way, running the patched bytecode.
  5. The Burp user performs a scan of the application in the normal way.
  6. When the application calls a potentially unsafe API, the instrumentation hook inspects the relevant parameters to the API. Any Burp payloads containing Burp Collaborator domains are fingerprinted based on their unique structure.
  7. The instrumentation hook mutates the detected Burp Collaborator domain to incorporate an identifier of the API that was called.
  8. The instrumentation hook performs a DNS lookup of the mutated Burp Collaborator domain.
  9. Optionally, based on configuration options, the instrumentation hook makes an HTTP/S request to the mutated Burp Collaborator domain, including the full value of the relevant parameter and the application call stack.
  10. Burp polls the Collaborator server in the normal way to retrieve details of any Collaborator interactions that have occurred as a result of its scan payloads. Details of any interactions that have been performed by the Burp Infiltrator instrumentation are returned to Burp.
  11. Burp reports to the user that the relevant item of input is being passed by the application to a potentially unsafe API, and generates an informational scan issue of the relevant vulnerability type. If other evidence was found for the same issue (based on in-band behavior or other Collaborator interactions) then this evidence is aggregated into a single issue.

Issues reported by Burp Infiltrator

Burp Infiltrator allows Burp Scanner to report usage of potentially dangerous server-side APIs that may constitute a security vulnerability. It also allows Burp to correlate the external entry point for a vulnerability (for example a particular URL and parameter) with the back-end code where the vulnerability occurs.

In the following example, Burp Scanner has identified an XML injection vulnerability based on Burp's existing scanning techniques, and also reports the unsafe API call that leads to the vulnerability within the server-side application:

Burp Infiltrator enables Burp to report:
  • The potentially unsafe API that was called.
  • The full value of the relevant parameter to that API.
  • The application call stack when the API was invoked.
This information can be hugely beneficial for numerous purposes:
  • It provides additional evidence to corroborate a putative vulnerability reported using conventional dynamic scanning techniques.
  • It allows developers to see exactly where in their code a vulnerability occurs, including the names of code files and line numbers.
  • It allows security testers to see exactly what data is passed to a potentially unsafe API as a result of submitted input, facilitating manual exploitation of many vulnerabilities, such as SQL injection into complex nested queries.

Important considerations

Please take careful note of the following points before using Burp Infiltrator:
  • You should read all of the documentation about Burp Infiltrator before using it or inducing anyone else to use it. You should only use Burp Infiltrator in full understanding of its nature and the risks inherent in its utilization.
  • You can use a private Burp Collaborator server with Burp Infiltrator, provided the Collaborator server is configured using a domain name, not via an IP address.
  • You can install Burp Infiltrator within a target application non-interactively, for use in CI pipelines and other automated use cases.
  • During installation of Burp Infiltrator, you can configure whether full parameter values and call stacks should be reported, and various other configuration options.
For more details, including step-by-step instructions, please refer to the Burp Infiltrator documentation.

Friday, July 15, 2016

Executing non-alphanumeric JavaScript without parenthesis

I decided to look into non-alphanumeric JavaScript again and see if it was possible to execute it without parenthesis. A few years ago I did a presentation on non-alpha code if you want some more information on how it works take a look at the slides. Using similar techniques we were able to hack Uber.

A few things have changed in the browser world since the last time I looked into it, the interesting features are template literals and the find function on the array object. Template literals are useful because you can call functions without parenthesis and the find function can be generated using "undefined" and therefore is much shorter than the original method of "filter".

The basis of non-alpha involves using JavaScript objects to generate strings that eventually lead to code execution. For example +[] creates zero in JavaScript, [][[]] creates undefined. By converting objects such as undefined to a string like this [[][[]]+[]][+[]] then we can reuse those characters and get access to other objects. We need to call the constructor property of a function if we want to call arbitrary code, like this [].find.constructor('alert(1)')().

So the first task is to generate the string "find", we need to generate numbers in order to get the right index on the string undefined. Here's how to generate the number 1.

Basically the code creates zero ! flips it true because 0 is falsey in JavaScript, then + is the infix operator which makes true into 1. Then we need to create the string undefined as mentioned above and get 4th index by add those numbers together. To produce "f".


Then we need to do the same thing to generate the other letters increasing/decreasing the index.


Now we need to combine the characters and access the "find" function on an array literal.

[][[[][[]]+[]][+[]][!+[]+!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+[[][[]]+[]][+[]][!+[]+!+[]+!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+[[][[]]+[]][+[]][!+[]+!+[]+!+[]+!+[]+!+[]+!+[]]+[[][[]]+[]][+[]][!+[]+!+[]]]//find function

This gives us some more characters to play with, the find function's toString value is function find() {[native code]}, the important character here is "c". We can use the code above to get the find function and convert it to a string then get the relevant index.


Now we continue and get the other characters of "constructor" using "object", true and false and converting them to strings.


It's now possible to access the Function constructor by getting the constructor property twice on an array literal. Combine the characters above to form "constructor", then use an array literal []['constructor']['constructor'] to access the Function constructor.


Now we need to generate the code we want to execute in this case alert(1), true and false can generate alert. then we need the parenthesis from the [].find function.


That's the code generated now we need to execute it. Template literals will call a function even if it's an expression this allows you to place them next to each other and is very useful for non-alpha code. The Function constructor returns a function and actually needs to be called twice in order to execute the code. E.g Function`alert(1)``` this is perfectly valid JavaScript. You might think you can just pass a generated string inside a template literal and execute the Function constructor however this won't quite work as demonstrated by the following code alert`${'ale'+'rt(1)'}`. The template literals pass each part of the string as an argument, if you place some text before and after the template literal expression then you'll see two arguments are sent to the calling function, the first argument contains the text before and after the template expression separated by a comma and the second argument contains the result of the template literal expression. Like the following code demonstrates:

function x(){ alert(arguments[0]);alert(arguments[1])  }

All that's left to do is pass our generated Function constructor to a template literal and instead of using "x" as above we use "$" at either side of the template literal expression. This creates two unused arguments for the function. The final code is below.


Enjoy - @garethheyes

Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Web Storage: the lesser evil for session tokens

I was recently asked whether it was safe to store session tokens using Web Storage (sessionStorage/localStorage) instead of cookies. Upon googling this I found the top results nearly all assert that web storage is highly insecure relative to cookies, and therefore not suitable for session tokens. For the sake of transparency, I've decided to publicly document the rationale that lead me to the opposite conclusion.

The core argument used against Web Storage says because Web Storage doesn't support cookie-specific features like the Secure flag and the HttpOnly flag, it's easier for attackers to steal it. The path attribute is also cited. I'll take a look at each of these features and try to examine the history of why they were implemented, what purpose they serve and whether they really make cookies the best choice for session tokens.

The Secure Flag

The secure flag is quite important for cookies, and outright irrelevant for web storage. Web Storage adheres to the Same Origin Policy, which isolates data based on an origin consisting of a protocol and a domain name. Cookies need the secure flag because they don't properly adhere to the Same Origin Policy - cookies set on https://example.com will be transmitted to and accessible via http://example.com by default. Conversely, a value stored in localStorage on https://example.com will be completely inaccessible to http://example.com because the protocols are different.

In other words, cookies are insecure by default, and the secure flag is simply a bodge to make them as resilient to MITM attacks as Web Storage. Web Storage used over HTTPS effectively has the secure flag by default. Further information on related nuances in the Same Origin Policy can be found in The Tangled Web by Michal Zalewski.

The Path Attribute

The path attribute is widely known to be pretty much useless for security. It's another example of where cookies are out of sync with the Same Origin Policy - paths are not considered part of an origin so there's no security boundary between them. The only way to isolate two applications from each other at the application layer is to place them on separate origins.

The HttpOnly Flag

The HttpOnly flag is an almost useless XSS mitigation. It was invented back in 2002 to prevent XSS being used to steal session tokens. At the time, stealing cookies may have been the most popular attack vector - it was four years later that CSRF was described as the sleeping giant.

Today, I think any competent attacker will exploit XSS using a custom CSRF payload or drop a BeEF hook. Session token stealing attacks introduce a time-delay and environment shift that makes them impractical and error prone in comparison - see Why HttpOnly Won't Protect You for more background on why. This means that if an attacker is proficient, HttpOnly won't even slow them down. It's like a WAF that's so ineffective attackers don't even notice it exists.

The only instance I've seen where HttpOnly was a significant security boundary is on bugzilla.mozilla.org. Untrusted HTML attachments are served from a subdomain which has access to the parent domain's session cookies thanks to cookies' not-quite-same-origin-policy. Ultimately as with the secure flag, the HttpOnly flag is only really required to make cookies as secure as web storage.

Differences that Matter

One major difference between the two options is that unlike cookies, web browsers don't automatically attach the contents of web storage to HTTP requests - you need to write JavaScript to attach the session token to a HTTP header. This actually conveys a huge security benefit, because it means the session tokens don't act as an ambient authority. This makes entire classes of exploits irrelevant. Browsers' behaviour of automatically attaching cookies to cross-domain requests is what enables attacks like CSRF and cross-origin timing attacks. There's a specification for yet another another cookie attribute to fix this very problem in development at the moment but for now to get this property, your best bet is Web Storage.

Meanwhile, the unhealthy state of the cookie protocol leads to crazy situations where the cookie header can contain a blend of trusted and untrusted data. This is something the ill-conceived double-submit CSRF defence fell foul of. The solution for this is yet another cookie attribute: Origin.

Unlike cookies, web storage doesn't support automatic expiry. The security impact of this is minimal as expiry of session tokens should be done server-side, but it is something to watch out for. Another distinction is that sessionStorage will expire when you close the tab rather than when you close the browser, which may be awesome or inconvenient depending on your use case. Also, Safari disables Web Storage in private browsing mode, which isn't very helpful.

This post is intended to argue that Web Storage is often a viable and secure alternative to cookies. Web Storage isn't ideal for session token storage in every situation - retrofitting it to a non single-page application may add a significant request overhead, Safari disables Web Storage in private browsing mode, and it's insecure in Internet Explorer 8. Likewise, if you do use cookies please use both Secure and HttpOnly.


At first glance it looks like cookies have more security features, but they're ultimately patches over a poor core design. For an in depth assessment of cookies, check out HTTP cookies, or how not to design protocols. Web Storage offers an alternative that, if not secure by default, is less insecure by default.

 - @albinowax

Friday, May 20, 2016

Using disk-based projects with OpenJDK

Since the introduction of Burp projects in Burp Suite 1.7 we've had some reports of native crashes in the OpenJDK JVM when using disk-based projects.

Disk-based projects use memory-mapped files, which have been a core part of the Java API spec for a very long time. Because memory-mapped files need to be implemented in native code, there is inherently more potential for compatibility issues, both with the core OS and with disk drivers.

It appears that a bug in OpenJDK may cause the JVM process to crash when using memory-mapped files. This appears to affect only certain platforms, notably Kali Linux.

The easiest way to resolve this issue is to use Oracle Java, which does not contain the bug.

We appreciate that in some instances using Oracle Java may not be practical. We have received reports that this bug has been patched in JDK 9, and it may be possible to backport this patch to Java 7 or 8.

Monday, April 25, 2016

Adapting AngularJS Payloads to Exploit Real World Applications

Every experienced pentester knows there is a lot more to XSS than <script>alert(1)</script> - filtering, encoding, browser-quirks and WAFs all team up to keep things interesting. AngularJS Template Injection is no different. In this post, we will examine how we adapted template injection payloads to bypass filtering and encoding and exploit Piwik and Uber.

Lower case conversion

Piwik, an open-source analytics platform with a healthy 2.7 million downloads, uses AngularJS 1.2.26, and displays search queries from visitors.

By spoofing a referral from Google, we can inject a keyword containing an Angular expression in here. However, injecting the appropriate sandbox escape for Angular 1.2.26 doesn't work:


Piwik converts this input to lower case, preventing the charAt function from being overwritten and valueOf from being called. We easily got round those restrictions by using unicode escapes to overwrite the charAt function:


and used ''.concat instead of valueOf:


Here is the final payload (Broken slightly to discourage exploits):



This vulnerability is really quite serious - an unauthenticated attacker can inject a payload which will hijack the account of anyone who views it. If an admin account is hijacked, we may be able to install a malicious module and take complete control of the webserver. Update to Piwik 2.16.1 to get the fix.

No quotes allowed

The ride-sharing company Uber lets developers submit and manage apps via developer.uber.com. They use a third party (readme.io) to display associated documentation at https://developer.uber.com/docs/.

This site uses AngularJS and reflects the current URL using server-side templating, but crucially doesn't URL decode it first. Firefox and Chrome both URL-encode quotes and apostrophes, meaning that if we want a cross-browser payload (and a decent vulnerability bounty), we need an alternative way of getting the string object. Also, we can't use any spaces, regardless of the browser.

Using the toString method of an object, we can create a string without the need for single or double quotes. ({}.toString) creates the string, then we can use its constructor to access the String object and call fromCharCode.


Mario Heiderich came up with a shorter version that removes the object literal reference. This can also be reduced (for those of you who like code "golfing") to:-


No quotes or constructor

However, there was one more catch. Uber was using Angular 1.2.0 which bans accessing constructor via a regular javascript property like obj.constructor, although an object accessor like obj['constructor'] was allowed. So I needed to generate the string "constructor" but I couldn't access the String constructor to call fromCharCode because I need to pass the string "constructor". A chicken and egg situation.

I thought how I could generate a string and concatenate them together without using +. I decided to use arrays. First off I create a blank array.
The next problem was how to generate the required characters for constructor without the ability to call fromCharCode (because we can't use constructor yet) and no quotes! The trick here is to use existing objects to generate the required characters. You could almost think of this as a twisted kind of ROP. Using the toString method of the currently scoped object will generate the string [object Object] giving us some of the characters required for constructor.

o=toString();//[object Object]

The observant among you might be wondering how we could get a "n" since Angular tolerates undefined objects so we can't convert an undefined object into a string. The solution is to use the anchor "function" on the string as the generated output contains an "n".

t=o.anchor(true);//<a name="true">[object Undefined]</a>

Next I need to generate false too using the same method. You could use false.toString() instead of course. And now add all the strings into the array.

I then need to join these characters together but I can't generate a blank string using quotes. The solution is to use an array literal which does the same thing.


So we have our string "constructor" the next stage is to use the required exploit for 1.2.0 by Jan Horn and pass our string to it. We can now generate characters using fromCharCode now that we can use "constructor". Here is the final exploit in all its glory.


Uber/readme.io somewhat impressively patched this issue within 24 hours of it being reported.

Even when you're inside a JavaScript sandbox, there is still plenty of room for adapting exploits to bypass environmental constraints. These techniques should serve as a foundation for tackling whatever you encounter.

Happy sandbox hacking - @garethheyes & @albinowax

Friday, April 15, 2016

Edge XSS filter bypass

I originally reported this issue to Microsoft on 4th September 2015 but it remains unfixed. As it has been so long since my original report I have decided to blog about the details now.

IE had a flaw in the past where you could use the location object as a function and combine toString/valueOf in a object literal to execute code. I think it was first discovered by Sirdarckcat but I may be wrong. Basically you use the object literal as a fake array which calls the join function that constructs a string from the object literal and passes it to valueOf which in turn passes it to the location object. Here is the code:


This also works on the latest version of Edge too however both browsers will detect it as a XSS attack. The XSS filter regexes detect a string followed by any number of characters, followed by either a "{" or "," then toString/valueOf and colon character. The "a" from valueOf and the "o" from toString are replaced by the "#" character. Here is a simplified version of the regex:


Here are the Regexes as of October 2015.

Edge though supports ES6 and there are some useful new features. Computed properties in ES6 allow you to pass an expression to calculate the property name. For example:


I think you can see where this is going. By combining the two techniques we can bypass the Edge XSS filter. As shown earlier the regexes look for toString/valueOf unfortunately we can obfuscate them using computed properties.



Happy filter hacking - @garethheyes

Friday, April 8, 2016

Introducing Burp projects

The latest major release of Burp introduces some great new capabilities for handling Burp's data and configuration. This blog post covers the following areas:
  • Burp project files
  • Changes to Burp's configuration options
  • Configuration files
  • The new startup wizard
  • New APIs
  • New command line arguments
  • Transitioning existing data and configuration
  • Feature roadmap

Burp project files

Burp's new project files are used to hold all of the data and configuration for a particular piece of work. Data is saved incrementally into the file as you work. When you reopen an existing project, Burp reloads the project's data and configuration, and you can resume working where you left off.

Burp project files are a replacement for the existing state file functionality, and are significantly superior in various ways:
  • Data is saved automatically in real time. There is no need to specifically save your work when you are finished. If Burp exits abnormally, all its data is preserved.
  • Burp reopens project files considerably faster than state files. In our testing, project files that are several gigabytes in size can be reopened in a few seconds.
  • A problem with Burp's non-incremental automatic backup feature, where each periodic backup consumed more and more disk space, has gone away.
  • All data is held in the project file, including some items that were not previously included in state files, such as the Scanner's issue activity log.
Note: The new project files feature is not available on 32-bit platforms or in the free edition of Burp.

Changes to Burp's configuration options

Burp's configuration options have been split into two groups: user options and project options. This has been done to make it easier to work with Burp's configuration when dealing with multiple separate projects.

User-level options are those relating to the individual user's environment and UI, including:
  • Everything in the new "User options" tab, such as font settings.
  • Options in the Extender tool, including the list of configured extensions.
  • UI-related options in other tools, such as the selected view of the Target site map.
Project-level options are those relating to the work that is being performed on a particular target application, including:
  • Everything in the new "Project options" tab, such as session handling rules.
  • Non-UI-related options in individual Burp tools, such as Proxy and Scanner.
User-level options will typically be long-lived and are automatically preserved across different Burp sessions. Project-level options are not automatically preserved in the same way. Rather, they are stored within project files and configuration files.

Some options, such as upstream proxy settings, can be defined at both the project and user level. For these options, you can configure your normal options at the user level, and then override these if required on a per-project basis. For example, you might normally use a corporate LAN proxy to connect to the Internet, and you can configure this in your user-level settings. For particular projects, when testing an internal application or on site at a particular client, you might need to use a different upstream proxy or none at all. You can configure this in your project-level settings for the relevant projects.

Configuration files

You can use Burp's new configuration files to manage different configurations for particular tasks. For example, you might need to load a particular configuration when working on a particular client. Or you might create different configurations for different types of scans.

Separate configuration files can be used to manage user-level and project-level options.

You can load and save configuration files in various ways:
  • From the Burp menu, you can load or save configuration files for all user-level or project-level options:

  • From individual configuration panels throughout Burp, you can use the new "Options" button to load or save the configuration for just that panel:

  • In the new startup wizard, when creating or reopening a project, you can specify a configuration file from which to load project-level options:
  • When starting Burp from the command line, you can use the new command line arguments to specify one or more configuration files from which to load project-level options.
  • Burp extensions can load or save project-level configuration file contents via the new APIs.
Configuration files use the JSON format. The structure and naming scheme used within the JSON correspond to the way that options are presented within the Burp UI. The easiest way to generate a configuration file for a particular purpose is to create the desired configuration within the Burp UI and save a configuration file from it. If preferred, you can also hand-edit an existing configuration file, since the contents are human-readable and self-documenting:

Partial configuration files can be used when needed. You can create a partial configuration file by saving the configuration of just one area of Burp, via the new "Options" button on each configuration panel, or by removing the unneeded sections from a full configuration file. When a partial configuration file is loaded, any options that are not defined within that file are left unchanged. This allows you to create small focused partial configuration files for common purposes, and load them when required to create a desired overall configuration.

New APIs

There are two new APIs that extensions can use to manage project-level options:

void loadConfigFromJson(String config);
String saveConfigAsJson(String... configPaths);

Both methods handle settings using the new JSON format that is used in configuration files.

The load method takes a String containing some configuration options, and updates Burp with the specified options. Partial configurations are acceptable, and any settings not specified will be left unmodified.

The save method by default saves the entire project-level configuration. To include only certain sections of the configuration, you can optionally supply the path to each section that should be included, for example: "project_options.connections".

The APIs only operate on project-level options, and user-level options cannot be loaded or saved via the API.

The old API methods for processing options via maps of name/value pairs, and for saving and loading state files, are now deprecated and will be removed at some future point.

The new startup wizard

When Burp launches, a new startup wizard is displayed.

The first screen lets you choose what Burp project to open:

You can choose from the following options to create or open a project:
  • Temporary project - This option is useful for quick tasks where your work doesn't need to be saved. All data is held in memory, and is lost when Burp exits.
  • New project on disk - This creates a new project that will store its data in a Burp project file. This file will hold all of the data and configuration for the project, and data is saved incrementally as you work. You can also specify a name for the project.
  • Open existing project - This reopens an existing project from a Burp project file. A list of recently opened projects is shown for quick selection. When this option is selected, the Spider and Scanner tools will be automatically paused when the project reopens, to avoid sending any unintentional requests to existing configured targets. You can deselect this option if preferred.
Note: You can rename a project later via the Burp menu.

The next screen lets you choose what project configuration to use:

You can choose from the following options for the project configuration:
  • Use Burp defaults - This will open the project using Burp's default options.
  • Use options saved with project - This is only available when reopening an existing project, and will open the project using the options that were saved in the project file.
  • Load from configuration file - This will open the project using the options contained in the selected Burp configuration file. Note that only project-level options in the configuration file will be reloaded, and any user-level options will be ignored. A list of recently used configuration files is shown for quick selection.

New command line arguments

There are two new command line arguments to facilitate working with Burp projects and configuration files:

--project-file=filename  Opens the specified project file. The file will be created as a new project if it does not already exist.
--config-file=filename  Loads the specified project configuration file(s). This option may be repeated to load multiple files.

The new command line arguments are particularly useful for the following purposes:
  • When automating Burp from scripts or other processes, you can launch Burp with a specified project file and configuration file. For example, your CI pipeline could launch Burp specifying the filename into which the project will be saved as an artifact, and a configuration file containing details of target scope or scanning options.
  • If you create different configuration files for common purposes, you can create desktop shortcuts to launch Burp with different configurations. When Burp is launched with the config-file option, the startup wizard will skip the step to select a configuration file, thereby speeding up the startup process.

Transitioning existing data and configuration

The changes to Burp may require some action by users who want to continue working with existing data and configuration:
  • To transition data and configuration in an existing Burp state file, simply create a new Burp project, and then restore the state file in the normal way. All of the data and configuration from the state file will be stored in the project file, and this can then be reopened directly without need for the original state file.
  • Settings that are now part of user-level options (such as font settings) will automatically carry over from earlier versions of Burp.
  • Settings that are now part of project-level options (such as session handling rules) will not automatically carry over from earlier versions of Burp. If you have customized these in your locally saved settings, and want to use them in the new version, you'll need to use an old version of Burp to save a config-only state file, use the new version of Burp to restore that state file, and then save a configuration file containing the project-level options. When creating new Burp projects, you can select that configuration file in the startup wizard.

Feature roadmap

Burp's new capabilities surrounding projects and configuration are fully functional in their own terms, but give rise to a number of desirable features that will be added to Burp over the coming months:
  • If you launch Burp and choose to create a temporary project, it is not currently possible to change your mind and save your work into a disk-based project at a later time. We plan to provide a means of doing this.
  • Data is incrementally appended onto project files as it is generated. If you accumulate a large amount of data and then delete some of this within Burp (for example, by clearing a large Proxy history), the data is not actually removed from the project file, and the project file will not reduce in size. We plan to provide a means of compressing a project file to remove redundant data and reduce its size.
  • With the existing state file functionality, it is possible when saving a state file to select which tools' data to include, and whether to include only in-scope items. With the new project file feature, all of Burp's data is saved into the project file. We plan to provide a means of saving a project file that contains only selected items.
  • With the existing state file functionality, it is possible to restore multiple state files into the same instance of Burp, to merge the results of earlier work. With the new project file feature, only a single project file can be opened into each instance of Burp. We plan to provide a means of importing multiple project files to create a single combined project.
  • Intruder options are not currently handled by the new configuration file feature. We plan to provide a new way of handling Intruder configuration and attack data, based closely on the new Burp configuration and project files.
In parallel with the addition of the above features, some existing Burp features will be removed:
  • The automatic backup feature, which saves Burp's state periodically into state files, has been removed in the new release.
  • Existing APIs relating to configuration options and state files have been deprecated.
  • The ability to save new state files will be removed in the near term.
  • The ability to restore old state files will be removed in the longer term.

Support Center

Get help and join the community discussions at the Burp Suite Support Center.

Visit the Support Center ›

Copyright 2016 PortSwigger Ltd. All rights reserved.